%PDF-1.7
%
1 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2015-08-11T11:36:10-04:00
2015-08-11T11:36:12-04:00
2015-08-11T11:36:12-04:00
Adobe InDesign CC 2015 (Macintosh)
uuid:fc243ca8-5bdd-8d42-b885-c4743a3f3369
xmp.did:F77F11740720681188C68A37C9B06739
xmp.id:0a6ad539-09e4-49e9-bb16-73641eb5daaf
proof:pdf
converted
from application/x-indesign to application/pdf
Adobe InDesign CC 2015 (Macintosh)
/
2015-08-11T11:36:10-04:00
xmp.iid:d53f6bdb-e8d6-4265-a4db-c37f2ec6634f
xmp.did:F77F11740720681188C68A37C9B06739
xmp.did:F77F11740720681188C68A37C9B06739
default
application/pdf
Adobe PDF Library 15.0
False
endstream
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 612.0 792.0]/Type/Page>>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 612.0 792.0]/Type/Page>>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 612.0 792.0]/Type/Page>>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 612.0 792.0]/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 612.0 792.0]/Type/Page>>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 612.0 792.0]/Type/Page>>
endobj
55 0 obj
<>stream
q
/GS0 gs
0 TL/Fm0 Do
Q
BT
0 0 0 1 k
/GS1 gs
/T1_0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 564 40.7641 Tm
(31)Tj
-0.003 Tc -0.012 Tw 11 0 0 11 36 712.2341 Tm
[(a while I thought I would just get rid of the notion of narrative, but \037\
nally what I decided)-3 ( )]TJ
0.004 Tc 0.013 Tw 0 -1.25 TD
[(is )0.5 (that )0.5 (what )0.5 (I )0.5 (want )0.5 (to do )0.5 (is )0.5 (explain )0.5 (what )0.5 (I )0.5 (mean )0.5 (by )0.5 (narrative )0.5 (and )0.5 (the way )0.5 (into )0.5 (it )0.5 (is )0.5 (this)4 ( )]TJ
0.01 Tc 0.026 Tw T*
[(business about the ambiguity of \223I*\224 and \223I,\224 because Peter \
Goldie has very helpfully,)9.9 ( )]TJ
0.004 Tc 0.012 Tw T*
[(in what is tragica)0.5 (lly his last book, explai)0.5 (ned)0.5 ( t)0.5 (he idea of narrative in terms of)0.5 ( t)0.5 (he)0.5 ( ability)4 ( )]TJ
0 Tc 0.013 Tw T*
[(to occupy multiple perspectives at once and Goldie and I disagr)11.7 (ee on a lot of things but )]TJ
-0.001 Tc -0.012 Tw T*
[(what I think is wr)11.7 (ong in Strawson\222s view is he thinks that you can just unpr)11.8 (oblematically)-1 ( )]TJ
0.011 Tc 0.029 Tw T*
[(occupy these multiple perspectives but what I think is that as persons o\
r as selves in)11 ( )]TJ
0.009 Tc 0.022 Tw T*
[(this case what we\222r)12.1 (e left with is the task of seeing how they can all be )]TJ
/T1_1 1 Tf
-0.009 Tw (mine)Tj
/T1_0 1 Tf
0.022 Tw [(. I have a)9 ( )]TJ
0.012 Tc 0.031 Tw T*
[(lot of diff)11.6 (er)11.7 (ent perspectives, I know my curr)11.6 (ent one is just one of many and I\222ll have)12 ( )]TJ
0.001 Tc 0.013 Tw T*
[(futur)11.7 (e ones that will be diff)11.8 (er)11.8 (ent, I know I\222ve had past ones that wer)11.8 (e diff)11.8 (er)11.8 (ent and yet)1 ( )]TJ
-0.003 Tc -0.013 Tw T*
[(somehow they\222r)12 (e all mine. And I think that talking about how we negotiate that can hel\
p)-3 ( )]TJ
0 Tc T*
[(e)0.5 (x)0.5 (p)0.5 (la)0.5 (i)0.5 (n)0.5 ( th)0.5 (e)0.5 ( p)0.5 (he)0.5 (n)0.5 (o)0.5 (m)0.5 (e)0.5 (no)0.5 (l)0.5 (o)0.5 (g)0.5 (y)0.5 ( o)0.5 (f)0.5 ( o)0.5 (u)0.5 (r e)0.5 (x)0.5 (p)0.5 (er)0.5 (i)0.5 (e)0.5 (n)0.5 (c)0.5 (in)0.5 (g)0.5 ( o)0.5 (ur)0.5 (s)0.5 (e)0.5 (l)0.5 (v)0.5 (es)0.5 ( a)0.5 (s)0.5 ( ex)0.5 (t)0.5 (e)0.5 (n)0.5 (d)0.5 (ed)0.5 ( i)0.5 (n)0.5 ( t)0.5 (i)0.5 (m)0.5 (e)0.5 (.)0.5 ( S)0.5 (o)0.5 ( r)12.4 (e)0.5 (a)0.5 (l)0.5 (l)0.5 (y )]TJ
0 Tw T*
(what I want to do is go back to that.)Tj
/T1_2 1 Tf
-0.045 Tw 0 -2.886 TD
[(And that mak)12 (es me think of Nagel\222s discussion of the absurd, that\222s why human \
lif)24.1 (e is )]TJ
-0.048 Tw 0 -1.25 TD
[(absurd because we can )0.5 (adopt two diff)24 (erent )0.5 (viewpoints, the viewpoint of us in the car )]TJ
0.028 Tw T*
[(and the )0.5 (viewpoint from above looking )0.5 (down at the )0.5 (car)60 (. And it\222s because the mouse )]TJ
0 Tw T*
[(can\222t do that that its lif)24.2 (e is not absurd. So absurdity could be part of personhood!)]TJ
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 -1.795 TD
(I think it very well might turn out to be.)Tj
/T1_2 1 Tf
0.18 Tw 0 -2.886 TD
[(W)24 (ell, I\222ve k)12 (ept you f)24 (or way too long, so I\222m going to thank you\205 I have more )]TJ
0 Tw 0 -1.25 TD
(questions, so maybe we\222ll have to do this again!)Tj
/T1_3 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 468 709.7144 Tm
(\037)Tj
/T1_0 1 Tf
( Peter Goldie )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
(has very helpfully )Tj
T*
(explained the idea )Tj
T*
(of narrative in )Tj
T*
(terms of the ability )Tj
T*
(to occupy multiple )Tj
T*
(perspectives at once )Tj
T*
(and what I think is )Tj
T*
[(wr)12 (ong in Strawson\222s )]TJ
T*
(view is he thinks )Tj
T*
(that you can just )Tj
T*
[(unpr)12 (oblematically )]TJ
-0.002 Tw T*
[(occupy )0.5 (these multiple )]TJ
0 Tw T*
(perspectives but )Tj
T*
(what I think is that )Tj
T*
(as persons or as )Tj
T*
(selves in this case )Tj
T*
[(what we\222r)12.1 (e left )]TJ
T*
(with is the task of )Tj
T*
(seeing how they )Tj
T*
(can all be )Tj
/T1_1 1 Tf
(mine)Tj
/T1_0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
/T1_3 1 Tf
(\036)Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Subtype/Form>>stream
BT
0 0 0 1 k
/GS0 gs
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 12 0 0 12 258.8827 733.764 Tm
(Marya Schechtman)Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
56 0 obj
<>
endobj
57 0 obj
<>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>stream
H\Mn b"v7*I%/= qTc· Q*
?֚ O <]Bb,++F.jq2wpl01!Pp~Փz\35zc/:vkչ(i@@^{#OM)n²!ߍ!Ti_bԤqvRL44VCԷLTrQ0=%&abLLBt˼ϼ1O}|&~o3o#2RbaE]oH]0?&䊓
0 J̉P
endstream
endobj
59 0 obj
<>stream
H|iPW wɎQa$ֱވ"* "
Rsl`͒
t/J9Eru,Z<1jƫ^3Nn~teXiqQ#0;FgwCĥ=AZ$7Gބ*RA? Uo?KYqMN@%4D6NȰ3`9
~*YԴ4Нp q01̜M ,zV}s